Housing market might sap economy
Wednesday, May 31st, 2006First quarter showed zip, but experts fear drop
Friday, May 26, 2006
Jeannine Aversa
ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON — The economy showed even more pep than initially thought in the first quarter, bounding ahead at a 5.3 percent pace. But a less energetic housing market and high energy prices now are taking out some of the oomph.
“I think we sort of had the last hurrah for the economy for a while,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at Global Insight. “We aren’t going to see this kind of growth for a bit.”
The figure released by the Commerce Department yesterday showed gross domestic product during the first quarter surpassing the 4.8 percent annual rate estimated a month ago. It marked the strongest growth spurt in 2 1 /2 years. The upgrade mostly reflected stronger U.S. exports and better inventory building by businesses.
GDP, which measures the value of all goods and services produced within the United States, totaled $11.39 trillion in the first quarter when annualized and adjusted for inflation.
President Bush, coping with his lowest job-approval ratings, said the GDP report provides evidence that “America’s economy is on the fast track.”
Some more forward-looking barometers, though, suggest economic growth may be moderating.
The housing market, once a star economic performer, is losing some of its shine as mortgage rates march higher. Sales of previously owned homes fell 2 percent in April to a pace of 6.76 million units, the National Association of Realtors said in another report.
House prices posted the smallest increase in 4 1 /2 years. And, the total number of unsold homes climbed to a record high of 3.38 million units.
Economists predict economic growth in the April-to-June quarter probably slowed to a pace of about 3 percent to 3.5 percent, which would still be decent. The performance of the housing market and energy prices will play key roles in shaping the ultimate outcome.
Yesterday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank can’t turn a blind eye to price changes for stocks and homes when setting interest rates but should take action only when they threaten the overall economy.
Bernanke suggested that the Fed shouldn’t try to identify and then prick speculative bubbles in home or stock prices that might develop.
There is little or no evidence that the Fed “is better able than the market to identify speculative bubbles and that it can successfully ‘deflate’ such bubbles without harming the broader economy,” he wrote in response to questions raised by Rep. Jim Saxton, R-N.J.